Headless CMS specialists for your dedicated team.

Where headless CMS fits in a long-term product team.

Decoupling pays when there is more than one consumer, or when the frontend needs to change independently of the content system. A single website with one frontend often gets less from headless than from a traditional CMS, and pays the editor-experience cost anyway.

The frequently overlooked cost is everything the traditional CMS included. Preview, URL management, redirects, sitemaps and media handling all come free in a coupled system and have to be built in a headless one, which is real work that estimates routinely omit.

What your dedicated team does with headless CMS.

Adopting headless for architectural preference, without a concrete requirement, is a common and expensive mistake. The right question is what specifically the coupling is preventing.

Answering that before committing is what scoping is for, as described in how it works.

Common headless CMS use cases.

• Several frontends from one content set Web, app and partner channels where duplication has caused divergence.
• The rebuild cost accounted for Preview, redirects and sitemaps estimated up front.
• A concrete reason to decouple A clear constraint in the coupled system that justifies the change.

Adding headless CMS skills to your team.

Content architecture is assigned inside development capacity, with the case for decoupling established before the platform is chosen.

At Azendo, headless CMS work sits with a dedicated software development team. Headless CMS work is assigned to dedicated, full-time specialists who work remotely in your repositories and are managed by us. It is the model behind every offshore team at Azendo, and how companies hire software developers without running the recruiting themselves.